辩论赛的作文
为增强学生的语言表达、沟通交流以及思辨能力，为校庆三十周年献礼。2019年11月20日晚七点，由我校学生处主办、校团委协办、校学生会承办的河南城建学院的第二届大学生辩论赛“诚信校园行”辩论赛决赛在行政楼报告厅举行。校团委刘海燕莅临现场观看比赛，校公会副周桂芸教授，法学与公共管理学院王芹萼副教授、王东明博士，宣传部副张溪潺副教授，校团委副李婵老师担任此次辩论赛的评委。 版权所有
本次辩论赛决赛在正方土木工程学院和反方市政与环境工程学院两支代表队间进行，他们围绕“个人诚信比社会诚信的存在先后顺序”这一辩题展开辩论。双方一辩以诙谐幽默的语言阐述己方观点后，便开始了激烈的唇舌战。在攻辩环节双方辩手显然都经过了充分的准备，他们引经据典的向对方进攻，面对一些复杂的问题双方辩手巧妙地回答引得场上喝彩声连连。在自由辩论环节双方辩手思维敏捷，他们据理力争、引经据典、思维严密，句句切中对方要害，不给对手留下任何破绽，充分展示了我校大学生的雄辩才能。双方选手紧抓对方论点的漏洞一一发问，细节偏颇之处进行一一击破。一番唇舌战之间，正方三辩的一句颇似调侃的反问--“连马克思都解决不了的问题，对方辩友解决吗?”顿时点燃了观众的热情，充分展示了辩手们巧舌如簧的应变口才。在最后的总结陈词阶段双方辩手运用经典的事例、严谨诙谐的措辞来例证自己的观点，赢得观众们的阵阵掌声。最终土木工程学院以微弱优势险胜，取得了本届辩论赛的冠军，市政与环境工程学院获得本届辩论赛的亚军。比赛最后，法学与公共管理学院王芹萼副教授为本次辩论赛作了精彩的点评。而昨天晚上七点在图书馆报告厅进行的三、四名争夺赛中，能源与建筑环境工程学院战胜化学与材料工程学院获得季军。
辩论赛的作文
甲方：何诗琪乙方：妈妈甲方：我觉得开卷无益，因为有些不健康的书就会错误的引导我们。
乙方：“是吗?我觉得开卷有益，因为只有增大书量，才能更好的扩大知识面，了解更多，况且，你们就一定要去看那些无益书吗?”妈妈耐心的指导我。
甲方：“那到是，像我这样非常的自觉，非常的……。
乙方：“打断，这可是在辩论。
甲方：哦。继续，继续。
乙方：如今，开卷有益这一词已成为了一个家喻户晓的四字成语。确实，博览群书能使人拥有高深的学问，能言善辩，受人尊敬。古代诗圣杜甫有句名言：“读书破万卷，下笔如有神。”这一点是不能否认的。如果你不善于去读书，那你写作文半天都憋不出一个好词好句。相反，只要你多读书，勤记录。那书的帮助就大了。”妈妈说，“你说呢?
甲方：是啊，一本好书胜过一个珍宝，一本坏书比任何坏人都坏。
乙方：一个人的美好前途就在于他所选择的书籍的种类，如果他所选择的是有益的书籍，那么他的前途将一片光明，但如果他选择的是一本无益的书，那他的前途就是黑暗的。但如果他能及时悬崖勒马，改过自新，我相信他也能有美好的前途。所以说：“开卷未必有益”这一说法也并不是完全真确的。
甲方：是啊。书能给我们提供素材;提供‘墨水’;提供知识。当然，书的好处也可想而知。但是，大家一定都知道这个故事，有一个人，他用了一生的时间去学屠龙术，最后终于被他给学成了，但是，却找不到一条龙，学会的知识派不上用场，想必，书也要有所选择。
乙方：书是人类的营养品，书是人类智慧的源泉，就像一个文明的国度如果失去了书的文化，那么这个曾经富丽繁华的国度便会遭受到灭亡的威胁。所以说，人是决不能离开书籍的。
甲乙双方：大家要多读书，读好书。
辩论赛的作文
今天，老师让我们参加一场辩论赛，正方主题是开卷有益，反方是开卷未必有益。
我们每个人都去找资料，准备一显身手。活动开始了，支持反方的，到三四两组去。我是支持正方的，去了一二两组。反方主辩赵雪儿手上拿着许多张纸，很严肃的样子。我们的主辩冯佳娜也不敢示弱，申请专注的拿着资料。辩论开始了，正方主辩发言：“我认为开卷有益是正确的，因为古人说过，书犹药也，读书可以医愚。”反方主辩犹豫了一下，反驳说：“那么不好的书，难道也是药，如果是这样那反而会把人引向无药可救的深渊。这也是开卷有益吗?” 这样双方你一言，我一句，唇舌剑展开辩论，辩论赛场地的空气中好像也弥漫着火药味。正当双方不相上下的时候，反方改变了策略，反方的其他辩手也向冯娜佳发起进攻，冯娜佳在他们的车轮战下渐渐不支。而我们正方的辩手，却没有得到有力的支援。我的内心有了一股不祥的预兆，手心也出了汗。终于冯娜佳在对方密集的炮火下，败下阵来。此时我真的很遗憾自己不善言语，因为，我好几次都想到了对方言语的弱点，无法向我们的主辩提供帮助。
这次辩论赛给我留下了深刻的印象
辩论赛的作文
Good evening，Ladies and gentlemen.
According to the law, every single individual is born with the right to keep living. Since death is just a part of life, to suggest that it is a right is to grant that it is a freedom to decide when and where to give up this kind of right. In a manner of speaking, it is a man’s right to commit suicide.
Again, we can find in the OXFord Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese dictionary the explanation of “suicide”----the act of killing oneself intentionally----which indicates that suicide is simply a libertarian movement for human freedom and the right of making choices. It is the law’s duty to protect human’s freedom and the right of making choices.
While it is without doubt that suicide, in reality, is human’s right, there main argument remain:
1,Maybe some people will say that the primary purpose of human being is to live, so suicide is inhumane and totally against the standard of ethic;
2,Suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person;
3,The people who commits suicide is irrespondsable to those who love him, even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself.
However, an evidence to sustain the first argument is difficult to obtain.It is common sense to note that Modern medicine has its own limitation and can not cure all the existing diseases.In spite of the extraordinary progress made in Modern medicine, problems remain in terms of guaranteeing that all the pains due to illness can be reduced to a tolerant level. As a result of this, at least in the near future, there must be some illnesses which can not be treated, some pains which are uncontrollable, some people who are terminally ill. Maybe the primary purpose of an ordinary and healthy human being is to live, but what if the person we are talking about is a terminally ill patient whose remaining time is no more than a series of suffering . Neither the law nor medical ethics requires “everything be done” to keep a person alive. However, insistnece, against the patient’s wishes, that death be postponed by every means available is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and inhumane. There comes a time when continued attempts to cure are not compassionate, wise or medically sound. That’s where only euthanasia can be of use. Voluntary euthanasia,which is another form of suicide, is human, because it brings mental and physical release to the patient and his family and helps to put an ultimate end to the torment of a termnally ill patient by hastening his death when he has no prospect of recovering. Extending an incurably sick patient’s life means the same as aggravating the pain . It is unnecessory to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness. Because effort should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meanless existence.
Others may argue that “suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person”. Indeed, killing another person is a kind of serious criminal offense which we call “murder”. However, what we are talkig about is “suicide”, not “murder”. Do they realise there is a big difference between the lives of our own and the lives of other people? Since it is our own life, we have the right to decide in what way the life meets its end. If not ,what is the difference gonna be? For instance, you are guity of keeping other people’s possession without permition. Because you are stealing the things which do not belong to you. But when it comes to your own possession, that it is to say, when you keep your own possession or even use it in a way that will probably destroy it,no one would consider you as guity.So, Sustaining the idea of “suicide is criminal offense” is as ridiculous as saying that a person is guity of using his own possession in a destructive way. In the case of suicide, there is no victims, let alone the so-called criminal offense.
With regard to the last argument----”the people who commit suicide ,even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself, is irresponsable to the people who really love him”----the argument itself, ironically is in some sense to abmit that suicide is a physical and mental realse. But what they fail to realise is that the kind of release is not just to the one who commit suicide, but also to his family.It is a terminally sick patient’s right as well as duty to put an utimate end to the torment of himself and his family. Because he is the reason of all the suffering. Those who choose suicide are a class of people whose remaining time is nothing but simply suffering, a class of people who choose death as an ultimate escape from the eternal torture they are destined to ,a class of people who need compassion and understanding from their relatives and the society, rather than meanlessly prolonging his painful life. If we really love the one who commit suicide, we should let him die in a desired way, die with dignity as he wishes. Because this is where true love lies.
Judging from what has been discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that we should make suicide legalized. Because it’s a new and bitter truth we must learn to face.
That’s all.Thank you.
辩论赛的作文
~~~时间~~~~~新生班级辩论赛决赛在~~~地点~~~隆重拉开帷幕。进入决赛的两个班级是一路过关斩将的。我院部分分团委学生会及带班出席了本场比赛。比赛开始后，场上双方辩手你来我往，唇舌战，围绕着辩题“”展开了激烈的辩论。辩论中选手们依然不失风度，始终面带微笑，侃侃而谈。良好的风范、出色的口才、敏捷的思维令场下观众为之折服，掌声不断。最终x班代表队凭借着出色的反应能力和严谨的逻辑夺得本届辩论赛冠军，惜居亚军。本次大赛旨在培养我院同学们的人文素质和思辨能力，营造良好的校园学术氛围。不仅为我院同学提供了展现自己的舞台，更提高了09级各班凝聚力，为以后深化学生文化建设奠定了夯实的基础。